nubia Z17 Lite vs UMiDIGI F2
Compare Phones: nubia Z17 Lite vs UMiDIGI F2
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (195.89 USD vs 254.99 USD)
Against:
Worse camera (575 points vs 914 points)
Worse battery (207 points vs 869 points)
Worse performance (634 points vs 710 points)
Worse connectivity (336 points vs 956 points)
Worse display (413 points vs 521 points)
Worse design (400 points vs 598 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2.2 vs f/1.7)
Worse main camera resolution (12.98 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 31.96 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (3200mAh vs 5150mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (1950 megahertz vs 2100 megahertz)
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (401 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (5.5 inch vs 6.53 inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (75.48 percents vs 83.12 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (914 points vs 575 points)
Better battery (869 points vs 207 points)
Better performance (710 points vs 634 points)
Better connectivity (956 points vs 336 points)
Better display (521 points vs 413 points)
Better design (598 points vs 400 points)
Against:
Higher price (254.99 USD vs 195.89 USD)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/2.2)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 12.98 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (31.96 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (5150mAh vs 3200mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2100 megahertz vs 1950 megahertz)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.53 inch vs 5.5 inches)
Against:
Lower pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 401 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (83.12 percents vs 75.48 percents)