Chuwi Hi9 vs Teclast P10 4G

For:

      Better camera (633 points vs 271 points)

      Better performance (838 points vs 642 points)

Against:

      Higher price (189.85 USD vs 141.24 USD)

      Worse battery (522 points vs 588 points)

      Worse connectivity (120 points vs 924 points)

      Worse display (577 points vs 876 points)

      Worse design (686 points vs 841 points)

For:

      Better main camera resolution (5.04 Megapixels vs 1.92 Megapixels)

      Better front camera resolution (1.92 Megapixels vs 0.31 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse battery capacity (4500mAh vs 4850mAh)

For:

      Higher cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 1300 megahertz)

      More gpu cores (2 cores vs 1 cores)

      Higher gpu frequency (700 megahertz vs 600 megahertz)

      More ram (4096 mega bytes vs 2048 mega bytes)

      More rom (65536 mega bytes vs 16384 mega bytes)

For:

      Higher pixel density (320 pixels per inch vs 149 pixels per inch)

Against:

      Smaller display (8.4 inch vs 10.1 inch)

For:

      Bigger display area (77.91 percents vs 74.34 percents)

For:

      Lower price (141.24 USD vs 189.85 USD)

      Better battery (588 points vs 522 points)

      Better connectivity (924 points vs 120 points)

      Better display (876 points vs 577 points)

      Better design (841 points vs 686 points)

Against:

      Worse camera (271 points vs 633 points)

      Worse performance (642 points vs 838 points)

Against:

      Worse main camera resolution (1.92 Megapixels vs 5.04 Megapixels)

      Worse front camera resolution (0.31 Megapixels vs 0.19 Megapixels)

For:

      Better battery capacity (4850mAh vs 4500mAh)

Against:

      Lower cpu frequency (1300 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)

      Less gpu cores (1 cores vs 2 cores)

      Lower gpu frequency (600 megahertz vs 700 megahertz)

      Less ram (2048 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)

      Less rom (16384 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)

For:

      Bigger display (10.1 inch vs 8.4 inches)

Against:

      Lower pixel density (149 pixels per inch vs 320 pixels per inch)

Against:

      Smaller display area (74.34 percents vs 77.91 percents)