Meizu 16 vs Xiaomi Redmi K40

For:

      Better performance (848 points vs 841 points)

Against:

      Higher price (335.85 USD vs 329.99 USD)

      Worse camera (604 points vs 782 points)

      Worse battery (100 points vs 706 points)

      Worse connectivity (395 points vs 727 points)

      Worse display (506 points vs 937 points)

      Worse design (867 points vs 935 points)

Against:

      Worse aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.7)

      Worse main camera resolution (12.19 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse battery capacity (3010mAh vs 4520mAh)

Against:

      Lower cpu frequency (2800 megahertz vs 3200 megahertz)

      Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)

For:

      Higher pixel density (402 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)

Against:

      Smaller display (6 inch vs 6.67 inch)

Against:

      Smaller display area (84.6 percents vs 86.16 percents)

For:

      Lower price (329.99 USD vs 335.85 USD)

      Better camera (782 points vs 604 points)

      Better battery (706 points vs 100 points)

      Better connectivity (727 points vs 395 points)

      Better display (937 points vs 506 points)

      Better design (935 points vs 867 points)

Against:

      Worse performance (841 points vs 848 points)

For:

      Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.8)

      Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 12.19 Megapixels)

For:

      Better battery capacity (4520mAh vs 3010mAh)

For:

      Higher cpu frequency (3200 megahertz vs 2800 megahertz)

      More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)

For:

      Bigger display (6.67 inch vs 6 inches)

Against:

      Lower pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 402 pixels per inch)

For:

      Bigger display area (86.16 percents vs 84.6 percents)