Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite vs Cubot X50
Compare Phones: Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite vs Cubot X50
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (180 USD vs 281.19 USD)
Better design (882 points vs 595 points)
Against:
Worse camera (580 points vs 966 points)
Worse battery (247 points vs 519 points)
Worse performance (564 points vs 871 points)
Worse connectivity (395 points vs 745 points)
Worse display (588 points vs 605 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse main camera resolution (12.19 Megapixels vs 64.22 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (24.84 Megapixels vs 35.95 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (3350mAh vs 4500mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2200 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
Against:
Less ram (4096 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (403 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (6.26 inch vs 6.67 inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (82.77 percents vs 84.02 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (966 points vs 580 points)
Better battery (519 points vs 247 points)
Better performance (871 points vs 564 points)
Better connectivity (745 points vs 395 points)
Better display (605 points vs 588 points)
Against:
Higher price (281.19 USD vs 180 USD)
Worse design (595 points vs 882 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better main camera resolution (64.22 Megapixels vs 12.19 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (35.95 Megapixels vs 24.84 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4500mAh vs 3350mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 2200 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.67 inch vs 6.26 inches)
Against:
Lower pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 403 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (84.02 percents vs 82.77 percents)