Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite vs Cubot X50
Compare Phones: Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite vs Cubot X50
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (180 USD vs 281.19 USD)
Better design (881 points vs 592 points)
Against:
Worse camera (576 points vs 965 points)
Worse battery (243 points vs 517 points)
Worse performance (560 points vs 870 points)
Worse connectivity (391 points vs 742 points)
Worse display (586 points vs 603 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse main camera resolution (12.19 Megapixels vs 64.22 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (24.84 Megapixels vs 35.95 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (3350mAh vs 4500mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2200 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
Against:
Less ram (4096 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (403 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (6.26 inch vs 6.67 inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (82.77 percents vs 84.02 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (965 points vs 576 points)
Better battery (517 points vs 243 points)
Better performance (870 points vs 560 points)
Better connectivity (742 points vs 391 points)
Better display (603 points vs 586 points)
Against:
Higher price (281.19 USD vs 180 USD)
Worse design (592 points vs 881 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better main camera resolution (64.22 Megapixels vs 12.19 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (35.95 Megapixels vs 24.84 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4500mAh vs 3350mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 2200 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.67 inch vs 6.26 inches)
Against:
Lower pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 403 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (84.02 percents vs 82.77 percents)