Oukitel K9 vs Nokia C01 Plus
Compare Phones: Oukitel K9 vs Nokia C01 Plus
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (512 points vs 39 points)
Better battery (927 points vs 133 points)
Better performance (443 points vs 14 points)
Better connectivity (515 points vs 435 points)
Better display (819 points vs 105 points)
Better design (745 points vs 240 points)
Against:
Higher price (278.99 USD vs 134.52 USD)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.09 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 4.92 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (6000mAh vs 3000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2300 megahertz vs 1600 megahertz)
More ram (4096 mega bytes vs 1024 mega bytes)
More rom (65536 mega bytes vs 16384 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (7.12 inch vs 5.45 inch)
Higher pixel density (350 pixels per inch vs 295 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (83.66 percents vs 72.37 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (134.52 USD vs 278.99 USD)
Against:
Worse camera (39 points vs 512 points)
Worse battery (133 points vs 927 points)
Worse performance (14 points vs 443 points)
Worse connectivity (435 points vs 515 points)
Worse display (105 points vs 819 points)
Worse design (240 points vs 745 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse video resolution (0.09 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (4.92 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (3000mAh vs 6000mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (1600 megahertz vs 2300 megahertz)
Less ram (1024 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
Less rom (16384 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (5.45 inch vs 7.12 inch)
Lower pixel density (295 pixels per inch vs 350 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (72.37 percents vs 83.66 percents)