Xiaomi Mi CC9 Pro vs Oppo Reno4

For:

      Lower price (539 USD vs 563.99 USD)

      Better camera (997 points vs 944 points)

      Better battery (890 points vs 488 points)

Against:

      Worse performance (700 points vs 895 points)

      Worse connectivity (395 points vs 755 points)

      Worse display (877 points vs 882 points)

      Worse design (562 points vs 881 points)

For:

      Better aperture (f/1.6 vs f/1.7)

      Better main camera resolution (108.58 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse front camera resolution (31.96 Megapixels vs 32.33 Megapixels)

For:

      Better battery capacity (5260mAh vs 4020mAh)

Against:

      Lower cpu frequency (2200 megahertz vs 2400 megahertz)

      Less ram (6144 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)

      Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)

For:

      Bigger display (6.47 inch vs 6.4 inch)

Against:

      Lower pixel density (398 pixels per inch vs 411 pixels per inch)

For:

      Bigger display area (88.05 percents vs 84.16 percents)

For:

      Better performance (895 points vs 700 points)

      Better connectivity (755 points vs 395 points)

      Better display (882 points vs 877 points)

      Better design (881 points vs 562 points)

Against:

      Higher price (563.99 USD vs 539 USD)

      Worse camera (944 points vs 997 points)

      Worse battery (488 points vs 890 points)

For:

      Better front camera resolution (32.33 Megapixels vs 31.96 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.6)

      Worse main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 108.58 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse battery capacity (4020mAh vs 5260mAh)

For:

      Higher cpu frequency (2400 megahertz vs 2200 megahertz)

      More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)

      More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)

For:

      Higher pixel density (411 pixels per inch vs 398 pixels per inch)

Against:

      Smaller display (6.4 inch vs 6.47 inch)

Against:

      Smaller display area (84.16 percents vs 88.05 percents)