Huawei P40 Pro+ vs Xiaomi Redmi 9T

For:

      Better performance (961 points vs 475 points)

      Better connectivity (805 points vs 515 points)

      Better display (842 points vs 687 points)

      Better design (815 points vs 446 points)

Against:

      Higher price (1274.57 USD vs 158 USD)

      Worse camera (595 points vs 766 points)

      Worse battery (545 points vs 900 points)

For:

      Better video fps (60 fps vs 30 fps)

      Better front camera resolution (31.96 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse aperture (f/1.9 vs f/1.7)

Against:

      Worse battery capacity (4200mAh vs 6000mAh)

For:

      Higher cpu frequency (2860 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)

      More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)

      More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)

Against:

      Lower gpu frequency (600 megahertz vs 950 megahertz)

For:

      Bigger display (6.58 inch vs 6.53 inch)

      Higher pixel density (441 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)

For:

      Bigger display area (91.92 percents vs 83.7 percents)

For:

      Lower price (158 USD vs 1274.57 USD)

      Better camera (766 points vs 595 points)

      Better battery (900 points vs 545 points)

Against:

      Worse performance (475 points vs 961 points)

      Worse connectivity (515 points vs 805 points)

      Worse display (687 points vs 842 points)

      Worse design (446 points vs 815 points)

For:

      Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.9)

Against:

      Worse video fps (30 fps vs 60 fps)

      Worse front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 31.96 Megapixels)

For:

      Better battery capacity (6000mAh vs 4200mAh)

For:

      Higher gpu frequency (950 megahertz vs 600 megahertz)

Against:

      Lower cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 2860 megahertz)

      Less ram (4096 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)

      Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)

Against:

      Smaller display (6.53 inch vs 6.58 inch)

      Lower pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 441 pixels per inch)

Against:

      Smaller display area (83.7 percents vs 91.92 percents)