Samsung Galaxy A12 vs Cubot X50

For:

      Lower price (155.8 USD vs 281.19 USD)

      Better battery (713 points vs 519 points)

Against:

      Worse camera (582 points vs 966 points)

      Worse performance (326 points vs 871 points)

      Worse connectivity (204 points vs 745 points)

      Worse display (214 points vs 605 points)

      Worse design (538 points vs 595 points)

Against:

      Worse main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 64.22 Megapixels)

      Worse front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 35.95 Megapixels)

For:

      Better battery capacity (5000mAh vs 4500mAh)

For:

      Higher cpu frequency (2300 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)

Against:

      Lower gpu frequency (680 megahertz vs 800 megahertz)

      Less ram (3072 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)

      Less rom (32768 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)

Against:

      Smaller display (6.5 inch vs 6.67 inch)

      Lower pixel density (264 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)

Against:

      Smaller display area (83.7 percents vs 84.02 percents)

For:

      Better camera (966 points vs 582 points)

      Better performance (871 points vs 326 points)

      Better connectivity (745 points vs 204 points)

      Better display (605 points vs 214 points)

      Better design (595 points vs 538 points)

Against:

      Higher price (281.19 USD vs 155.8 USD)

      Worse battery (519 points vs 713 points)

For:

      Better main camera resolution (64.22 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)

      Better front camera resolution (35.95 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse battery capacity (4500mAh vs 5000mAh)

For:

      Higher gpu frequency (800 megahertz vs 680 megahertz)

      More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 3072 mega bytes)

      More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 32768 mega bytes)

Against:

      Lower cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 2300 megahertz)

For:

      Bigger display (6.67 inch vs 6.5 inches)

      Higher pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 264 pixels per inch)

For:

      Bigger display area (84.02 percents vs 83.7 percents)