Huawei Mate 40 Pro vs POCO X3 Pro

For:

      Better camera (747 points vs 725 points)

      Better connectivity (897 points vs 515 points)

      Better display (933 points vs 775 points)

      Better design (904 points vs 600 points)

Against:

      Higher price (1100.27 USD vs 259.99 USD)

      Worse battery (624 points vs 882 points)

      Worse performance (547 points vs 812 points)

For:

      Better video fps (60 fps vs 30 fps)

      Better main camera resolution (50.33 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse aperture (f/1.9 vs f/1.7)

      Worse front camera resolution (12.98 Megapixels vs 20 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse battery capacity (4400mAh vs 5160mAh)

For:

      Higher cpu frequency (3130 megahertz vs 2960 megahertz)

      More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)

      More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)

For:

      Bigger display (6.76 inch vs 6.67 inch)

      Higher pixel density (456 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)

For:

      Bigger display area (94.41 percents vs 84.88 percents)

For:

      Lower price (259.99 USD vs 1100.27 USD)

      Better battery (882 points vs 624 points)

      Better performance (812 points vs 547 points)

Against:

      Worse camera (725 points vs 747 points)

      Worse connectivity (515 points vs 897 points)

      Worse display (775 points vs 933 points)

      Worse design (600 points vs 904 points)

For:

      Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.9)

      Better front camera resolution (20 Megapixels vs 12.98 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse video fps (30 fps vs 60 fps)

      Worse main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 50.33 Megapixels)

For:

      Better battery capacity (5160mAh vs 4400mAh)

Against:

      Lower cpu frequency (2960 megahertz vs 3130 megahertz)

      Less ram (6144 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)

      Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)

Against:

      Smaller display (6.67 inch vs 6.76 inch)

      Lower pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 456 pixels per inch)

Against:

      Smaller display area (84.88 percents vs 94.41 percents)