Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite vs Cubot X50

For:

      Lower price (251 USD vs 281.19 USD)

      Better display (855 points vs 605 points)

      Better design (735 points vs 595 points)

Against:

      Worse camera (941 points vs 966 points)

      Worse battery (494 points vs 519 points)

      Worse performance (687 points vs 871 points)

      Worse connectivity (476 points vs 745 points)

For:

      Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 64.22 Megapixels)

      Worse front camera resolution (31.96 Megapixels vs 35.95 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse battery capacity (4030mAh vs 4500mAh)

For:

      Higher cpu frequency (2200 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)

Against:

      Lower gpu frequency (500 megahertz vs 800 megahertz)

      Less ram (6144 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)

For:

      Higher pixel density (403 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)

Against:

      Smaller display (6.39 inch vs 6.67 inch)

For:

      Bigger display area (86.08 percents vs 84.02 percents)

For:

      Better camera (966 points vs 941 points)

      Better battery (519 points vs 494 points)

      Better performance (871 points vs 687 points)

      Better connectivity (745 points vs 476 points)

Against:

      Higher price (281.19 USD vs 251 USD)

      Worse display (605 points vs 855 points)

      Worse design (595 points vs 735 points)

For:

      Better main camera resolution (64.22 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)

      Better front camera resolution (35.95 Megapixels vs 31.96 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)

For:

      Better battery capacity (4500mAh vs 4030mAh)

For:

      Higher gpu frequency (800 megahertz vs 500 megahertz)

      More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)

Against:

      Lower cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 2200 megahertz)

For:

      Bigger display (6.67 inch vs 6.39 inches)

Against:

      Lower pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 403 pixels per inch)

Against:

      Smaller display area (84.02 percents vs 86.08 percents)