Cubot X50 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S

For:

      Lower price (281.19 USD vs 282.97 USD)

      Better camera (966 points vs 745 points)

      Better performance (871 points vs 484 points)

      Better connectivity (745 points vs 473 points)

Against:

      Worse battery (519 points vs 713 points)

      Worse display (605 points vs 888 points)

      Worse design (595 points vs 681 points)

For:

      Better front camera resolution (35.95 Megapixels vs 12.98 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse battery capacity (4500mAh vs 5000mAh)

For:

      More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)

      More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)

Against:

      Lower cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 2050 megahertz)

      Less gpu cores (3 cores vs 4 cores)

      Lower gpu frequency (800 megahertz vs 900 megahertz)

For:

      Bigger display (6.67 inch vs 6.43 inch)

Against:

      Lower pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 409 pixels per inch)

For:

      Bigger display area (84.02 percents vs 83.77 percents)

For:

      Better battery (713 points vs 519 points)

      Better display (888 points vs 605 points)

      Better design (681 points vs 595 points)

Against:

      Higher price (282.97 USD vs 281.19 USD)

      Worse camera (745 points vs 966 points)

      Worse performance (484 points vs 871 points)

      Worse connectivity (473 points vs 745 points)

For:

      Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse front camera resolution (12.98 Megapixels vs 35.95 Megapixels)

For:

      Better battery capacity (5000mAh vs 4500mAh)

For:

      Higher cpu frequency (2050 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)

      More gpu cores (4 cores vs 3 cores)

      Higher gpu frequency (900 megahertz vs 800 megahertz)

Against:

      Less ram (6144 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)

      Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)

For:

      Higher pixel density (409 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)

Against:

      Smaller display (6.43 inch vs 6.67 inch)

Against:

      Smaller display area (83.77 percents vs 84.02 percents)