Samsung Galaxy A50s vs Cubot X50
Compare Phones: Samsung Galaxy A50s vs Cubot X50
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (206 USD vs 281.19 USD)
Better display (707 points vs 605 points)
Better design (858 points vs 595 points)
Against:
Worse camera (908 points vs 966 points)
Worse battery (308 points vs 519 points)
Worse performance (502 points vs 871 points)
Worse connectivity (152 points vs 745 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 64.22 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (32.33 Megapixels vs 35.95 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (4000mAh vs 4500mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2300 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
Against:
Less ram (4096 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (403 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (6.4 inch vs 6.67 inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (85.42 percents vs 84.02 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (966 points vs 908 points)
Better battery (519 points vs 308 points)
Better performance (871 points vs 502 points)
Better connectivity (745 points vs 152 points)
Against:
Higher price (281.19 USD vs 206 USD)
Worse display (605 points vs 707 points)
Worse design (595 points vs 858 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better main camera resolution (64.22 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (35.95 Megapixels vs 32.33 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4500mAh vs 4000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 2300 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.67 inch vs 6.4 inches)
Against:
Lower pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 403 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (84.02 percents vs 85.42 percents)