Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite vs Ulefone Armor 6S
Compare Phones: Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite vs Ulefone Armor 6S
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (251 USD vs 340.49 USD)
Better camera (941 points vs 499 points)
Better display (855 points vs 541 points)
Better design (735 points vs 156 points)
Against:
Worse battery (494 points vs 773 points)
Worse performance (687 points vs 710 points)
Worse connectivity (476 points vs 849 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/2)
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (31.96 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (4030mAh vs 5000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2200 megahertz vs 2100 megahertz)
Against:
Lower gpu frequency (500 megahertz vs 900 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.39 inch vs 6.2 inch)
Higher pixel density (403 pixels per inch vs 402 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (86.08 percents vs 70.53 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better battery (773 points vs 494 points)
Better performance (710 points vs 687 points)
Better connectivity (849 points vs 476 points)
Against:
Higher price (340.49 USD vs 251 USD)
Worse camera (499 points vs 941 points)
Worse display (541 points vs 855 points)
Worse design (156 points vs 735 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2 vs f/1.7)
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 31.96 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (5000mAh vs 4030mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher gpu frequency (900 megahertz vs 500 megahertz)
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2100 megahertz vs 2200 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (6.2 inch vs 6.39 inch)
Lower pixel density (402 pixels per inch vs 403 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (70.53 percents vs 86.08 percents)