Vivo X50 vs Ulefone Armor 9
Compare Phones: Vivo X50 vs Ulefone Armor 9
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (874 points vs 864 points)
Better performance (895 points vs 650 points)
Better display (801 points vs 630 points)
Better design (978 points vs 132 points)
Against:
Higher price (998.39 USD vs 499.85 USD)
Worse battery (545 points vs 961 points)
Worse connectivity (608 points vs 927 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.6 vs f/1.7)
Better front camera resolution (31.96 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 64.44 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (4200mAh vs 6600mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2400 megahertz vs 2200 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.56 inch vs 6.3 inch)
Against:
Lower pixel density (398 pixels per inch vs 409 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (87.24 percents vs 70.87 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (499.85 USD vs 998.39 USD)
Better battery (961 points vs 545 points)
Better connectivity (927 points vs 608 points)
Against:
Worse camera (864 points vs 874 points)
Worse performance (650 points vs 895 points)
Worse display (630 points vs 801 points)
Worse design (132 points vs 978 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better main camera resolution (64.44 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.6)
Worse front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 31.96 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (6600mAh vs 4200mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2200 megahertz vs 2400 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (409 pixels per inch vs 398 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (6.3 inch vs 6.56 inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (70.87 percents vs 87.24 percents)